From Needs Analysis to Proposed Syllabus of Speaking Skills for Mechanical Engineering Students Development in the Workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v11i2.7285Abstract
This study reports the design of an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) speaking syllabus tailored for mechanical engineering students in a polytechnic setting. Using a mixed-method approach, present situation and target situation analyses were conducted with 11 fourth-semester students through questionnaires and interviews. Findings revealed that while students could manage basic self-introductions, they lacked competence in higher-order interactional skills and engineering-specific oral tasks, such as explaining diagrams or giving instructions. Target-situation data highlighted the need for English in job interviews, meetings, and communication with foreign clients. Based on these results, a hybrid syllabus combining situational and topical approaches was developed, incorporating authentic materials, task-based sequencing, and simulation-based assessments. The syllabus prioritizes high-frequency workplace communication while gradually integrating technical explanatory skills, aiming to enhance both employability and professional competence.
References
Allen, J. P. (1984). General-purpose language teaching: A variable focus approach. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 61–74). London: Pergamon Press.
Alsamadani, H. A. (2017). Needs analysis in ESP context: Saudi engineering students as a case study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 58–68.
Axmedovna, J. N., Gapporovna, S. M., Rozmatovna, A. O., & Tashkent, U. Z. (2019). The importance of needs analysis in teaching ESP. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(11).
Basturkmen, H. (2015). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Springer.
Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2023). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices. Sage Publications.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (Vol. 5). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Dewi, S. U. (2015). Syllabus of vocational high school based on ESP approach. Dinamika Ilmu, 15(2), 273–295.
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing language for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Development in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Irshad, I., & Anwar, B. (2018). Designing English for Specific Purposes course for computer science students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 156–163.
Johns, A. M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes: The state of the art. International Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 113–120.
Jonáková, S., Šikolová, M., & Veselá, M. (2022). Aspects influencing ESP syllabus design in lifelong military education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(4), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.4
Kim, N. (2019). Challenges and trials: Implementing localized task-based language teaching for novice L2 learners throughout three semesters. English Teaching, 74(3), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.74.3.201909.113
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
Pranoto, B. E., & Suprayogi, S. (2020). A need analysis of ESP for physical education students in Indonesia. Premise: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 94–110.
Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A holistic review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030104
Richards, J. C. (2016). Curriculum approaches in language teaching. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 117–131). Routledge.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching: A guide book for English language teachers (Vol. 2). Macmillan.
Supunya, N. (2023). A systematic review on ESP teachers: Current focus, collaboration, and sustainability. rEFLections, 30(1), 122–141. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/267781
Thomson, K. (2007). English for meetings. Oxford University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vaicekauskienė, L. (2023). The sociolinguistic dynamics of Russian and English in post‐1990 Lithuania. World Englishes, 42(4), 749–767.
Wallwork, A. (2014). Meetings, negotiations, and socializing. Springer.
White, R. V. (1988). The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management (Vol. 8). Blackwell.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Educational and pedagogic factors in syllabus design. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 23–28). London: Pergamon Press.
Woodrow, L. (2018). Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Routledge.
Yalden, J. (1984). Syllabus design in general education: Options for ELT. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 13–21). London: Pergamon Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JET (Journal of English Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in JET are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
