Bahasa Inggris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v10i3.6181Kata Kunci:
Bahasa InggrisAbstrak
Penelitian ini menyelidiki dampak dari gaya belajar yang beragam terhadap kemampuan pemahaman menyimak di kalangan mahasiswa pendidikan bahasa Inggris di sebuah universitas di Bandung, Indonesia. Menggunakan desain penelitian kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini melibatkan 10 peserta yang menjalani tes gaya belajar, dengan wawancara mendalam yang dilakukan pada tiga peserta terpilih. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkapkan spektrum gaya belajar. Wawancara memberikan wawasan yang berharga tentang strategi yang digunakan oleh setiap gaya belajar, seperti pelajar visual yang lebih menyukai video dan mencari penjelasan tambahan secara online. Pelajar auditori lebih menyukai penjelasan ahli dan lingkungan belajar yang tenang, sementara pelajar kinestetik menggunakan gerakan selama diskusi kelompok. Pengamatan di kelas menunjukkan keefektifan strategi yang disesuaikan, dengan menggabungkan alat bantu visual, elemen pendengaran, dan kegiatan langsung untuk menciptakan ruang belajar yang inklusif. Hasilnya menggarisbawahi pentingnya pendekatan multimodal untuk memaksimalkan keterlibatan dan pemahaman siswa. Disarankan bagi para pendidik untuk mengenali gaya belajar yang beragam, menggunakan metode instruksional yang fleksibel, dan mendorong lingkungan belajar yang inklusif. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini memperkuat gagasan bahwa para pendidik harus mengakui adanya berbagai gaya belajar, secara aktif mengadopsi pendekatan pengajaran yang mudah beradaptasi, dan mendorong lingkungan belajar yang inklusif, sehingga mengoptimalkan keterlibatan dan pemahaman siswa.
Referensi
Amaniyan, S., Pouyesh, V., Bashiri, Y., Snelgrove, S., & Vaismoradi, M. (2020). Comparison of the conceptual map and traditional lecture methods on students’ learning based on the VARK learning style model: a randomized controlled trial. SAGE Open Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820940550
An, W. (2022). You said, they said: A framework on informant accuracy with application to studying self-reports and peer-reports. Social Networks, 70, 187-197.
Bortfeld, H. (2019). Functional near‐infrared spectroscopy as a tool for assessing speech and spoken language processing in pediatric and adult cochlear implant users. Developmental psychobiology, 61(3), 430-443.
Bouchey, B., Castek, J., & Thygeson, J. (2021). Multimodal learning. Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward, 35-54.
Burmark, L. (2002). Visual literacy: Learn to see, see to learn. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Chevalier, A., Isphording, I. E., & Lisauskaite, E. (2020). Peer diversity, college performance, and educational choices. Labour Economics, 64, 101833.
Daoruang, B., Mingkhwan, A., & Sanrach, C. (2020). The Learning Material Classified Model Using VARK Learning Style. In The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2019)–Volume 2 22 (pp. 505-513). Springer International Publishing.
Ferreira, M., Martinsone, B., & Talić, S. (2020). Promoting sustainable social-emotional learning at school through a relationship-centered learning environment, teaching methods, and formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 21-36.
Föcker, J., Atkins, P., Vantzos, F.-C., Wilhelm, M., Schenk, T., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness of auditory, visual, and audio-visual sensory cues in a multiple object tracking environment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(5), 1611–1624. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02492-5
Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Ismail, S. M., & Haniff, W. A. A. W. (2020). Education 4.0: The effectiveness of VARK learning style towards actualising industrial revolution 4.0. J. Educ. Soc. Res, 10(3), 52.
Kagerer, F. A., & Clark, J. E. (2015). Development of kinesthetic-motor and auditory-motor representations in school-aged children. Experimental Brain Research, 233(7), 2181–2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4288-7
Kurita, & Ahmadi. (2016). Improving students’ listening comprehension using cloze dictation technique. (M. W. Saputra, Ed.) Makassar.
Leasa, M., Corebima, A. D., & bosluk, I. (2017). Emotional intelligence among auditory, reading, and kinesthetic learning styles of elementary school students in Ambon-indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131889
Mozaffari, H. R., Janatolmakan, M., Sharifi. R., Ghandinejad, F., Andayeshgar, B., & Khatony, A. (2020). The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in dental students, Advances in Medical Education and Practice.15-19. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S235002.
Nagaraj, N. K. (2021). Effect of auditory distraction on working memory, attention switching, and listening comprehension. Audiology Research, 11(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11020021
Pardede, P. (2019). Integrated skills approach in EFL classrooms: A literature review. In: PROCEEDING English Education Department Collegiate Forum (EED CF) 2015-2018. Jakarta: UKI Press, 147-159
Rost , Hamouda , G., & Subouri. (2016). Improving students’ listening comprehension using cloze dictation technique. Makassar. Retrieved Oktober 15, 2023, from https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/759-Full_Text.pdf
Tarigan. (1994). Listening to poetry has not been well done among students in Surakarta. p. 28. Retrieved Oktober 15, 2023
Torrington, J., & Bower, M. (2021). Teacher‐created video instruction in the elementary classroom—Its impact on students and teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1107-1126.
Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems, and opportunities. Computers in human behavior, 55, 1185-1193.
Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied linguistics, 39(1), 9-30.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Copyrights for articles published in JET are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
