FROM STRUCTURALISM TO DECONSTRUCTION: TRACING THE EVOLUTION OF LITERARY THEORIES AND THEIR RELEVANCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Sunara; Ida Maulida; Mimin Aminah

doi:10.33541/dia.v13i1.8113

Authors

Sunara Universitas Subang, Indonesia
Ida Maulida Universitas Subang, Indonesia
Mimin Aminah Universitas Subang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33541/dia.v13i1.8113

Keywords:

Literary Theory Evolution, Structuralism, Deconstruction, Interpretative Strategy

Abstract

This abstract explores the evolution of literary theories from Structuralism to Deconstruction and their significance. The introduction highpoints the paradigm shifts over the past century, beginning with Formalism, which emphasizes formal essentials of texts. Subsequently, Structuralism emerged by focusing on language systems, universal patterns, and binary oppositions that organize meaning across cultures. The development continued with Deconstruction, which challenges the notion of fixed meaning by emphasizing language’s inherent instability, ambiguity, and the endless deferment of meaning. The research employs comparative literature analysis to examine these theories’ core concepts differences, and interconnections. Findings show that despite their contrasting approaches, both theories deepen our understanding of how meaning is constructed and interpreted in texts. The analysis emphasizes that these theories remain highly relevant today especially in addressing complex societal issues related to gender identity, digital culture, ecological interconnectedness, and globalization. The conclusion emphasizes that the ongoing evolution from Structuralism to Deconstruction offers vital insights for contemporary literary and cultural analysis, developing more nuanced and flexible interpretative methods that reflect the complexities of modern society.

References

Abuzaifah, M. A. (2021). Paradigm Shift in the Schools of European Structuralism: From Pre-Structuralism to Post-Structuralism. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n4p26

Anshori, I. (2019). Analisis Kritis Terhadap Anatomi Teori Strukturalisme Claude Levi-Strauss (Larangan Incest dalam Sistem Pernikahan dan Kekerabatan, serta Relevansinya dengan Pendidikan Islam). Halaqa: Islamic Education Journal, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v3i1.2127

Austin, P. (2021). Theory of language: A taxonomy. SN Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00085-x

Barkhuizen, J. H. (1982). Linguistiese grondslae van moderne teksinterpretasie. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 38(4), 28–34. Https://Doi.Org/10.4102/Hts.V38i4.4269.

Bist, R. B. (2020). Postmodernism: An Anti-Foundational Philosophy of Western Intellectual Tradition. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(3), 627–632. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.53.8

Capone, L., Rocchi, M., & Bertolaso, M. (2024). Rethinking “digital”: A genealogical enquiry into the meaning of digital and its impact on individuals and society. AI and Society, 39(5), 2285–2295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01687-0

Caracciolo, M. (2019). Form, science, and narrative in the Anthropocene.

Coney, N. (2015). Performing Genders: A Study of Gender Fluidity. 104.

Darabi, B., & Sepehrmanesh, M. (2012). Meaning Perpetually Deferred: A Derridaean Study of Sam Shepard’s True West. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n3p69

Dubey, L. (2014). W. B. Yeats ’ Poem ‘ When You A re Old and Gray …’: A Deconstructionist Study. II(3), 3484–3494.

Enuka, C., & Ojukwu, E. C. (2016). Challenges of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy.

Hauer, T. (2017). Structuralism and Postmodern Discourse. Philosophy Study,. 7(4), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2017.04.003

Khan, S., & Malik, A. (2023). Barthes Five Codes In The John Cheever’s Short Story The Enormous Radio: A Structural Analysis. Central European Management Journal, 31, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.57030/23364890.cemj.31.2.53

Koyuncu, A. (2011). Levi-Stratuss Yap ı salc ı l ı ğ ı Levi-Strauss ’ s Structuralism.

Li, Y., & Shen, L. (2023). Analysis of Environmental News Reports From Ecological Discourse Theory. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 7(6), 1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2023.06.036

Lyu, L. (2024). The Dialectical Relationship of the Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Semiotics. Pacific International Journal, 7(3), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.55014/pij.v7i3.642

M., R. (2022). the Modality of Proppian “False Hero”: Neither a Hero Nor a Villain in (Folk) Narratives and Real Life. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.150

Martinez del Castillo, J. (2015). Meaning, What is It. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6), 67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030601.19

Mondal, P. (2018). Lexicon, meaning relations, and semantic networks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2244, 40–52.

Muhammadi, T. A. (2016). Saussurian Structuralism in Linguistics. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 20, 27–31.

Open Research Online. (2014). Choice Reviews Online, 51(06), 51-2973-51–2973. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-2973

Phelan, J., & Frow, J. (2022a). Reading Characters Rhetorically. Narrative, 30(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2022.0015

Phelan, J., & Frow, J. (2022b). Reading Characters Rhetorically. Narrative, 30(2), 255–267. Https://Doi.Org/10.1353/Nar.2022.0015.

Pitkanen, M. (2015). On Life , Death , Good and Evil Life and Death. 6(4), 222–239.

Ponzio, L., & Salento, U. (1934). Visões do estruturalismo: 759–779.

Rizkian, M. F. (2023). Strukturalisme Topeng Betawi Lakon Si Jantuk. Deiksis, 15(3), 254. https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v15i3.21075

Shapiro, S. (2022). CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.4283

Snow, C., & O’Connor, C. (2016a). Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion: Fostering a Vital Connection. Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600102

Snow, C., & O’Connor, C. (2016b). Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion: Fostering a Vital Connection. Journal of Education, 196(1), 1–8. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/002205741619600102.

Stawarska, B. (2015). Strange life of a sentence: Saussurean doctrine and its discontents. Philosophy Today, 59(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201522666

Stephens, E. (2014). Feminism and New Materialism: The Matter of Fluidity. Interalia: A Journal of Queer Studies, 186–202. https://doi.org/10.51897/interalia/bosz9092

Tchougounnikov, S. (2020a). European Formalism and Empiriocriticism: Formalism within the International Empiriocritical Movement. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(1).

Tchougounnikov, S. (2020b). European Formalism and Empiriocriticism: Formalism within the International Empiriocritical Movement. Linguistic Frontiers, 3(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/lf-2020-0004

Thomas Hauer. (2017). Structuralism and Postmodern Discourse. Philosophy Study, 7(4), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2017.04.003

Volek, M. E. (2006). Machinic Relations in the Production of Signs (McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario). https://prod-ms-be.lib.mcmaster.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/6d5359b4-071b-4fce-a9cd-b1926f5dbefa/content

Wang, Y., Roberts, C. W., Wang, Y., & Roberts, C. W. (2005). Montclair State University Digital Commons Actantial analysis Greimas ’ s structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives Actantial analysis Greimas ’ s structural approach to the analysis of self-narratives.

Yegen, C., & Abukan, M. (2014). Derrida and Language: Deconstruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i2.5210

Zengguang, L. (2010). Structure and meaning. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 41(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSP1097-1467410307

Zou, X. (2023). Myth Theory and Structuralism—A Study of Lévi- Strauss’s mythological Research from Myth and Meaning. Social Science, Humanities and Sustainability Research, 4(3), p106. https://doi.org/10.22158/sshsr.v4n3p106