Metacognitive Skills of Pre-Service Biology Teachers: An Analysis through Laboratory Activities

Authors

  • Ajeng Purnama Heny Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Buleleng
  • Ina Yuliana Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, FMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Buleleng
  • Putu Krisna Widyantara Sujana Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Buleleng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33541/pro-life.v12i3.7385

Keywords:

pre-service biology teachers, metacognitive, practicum , laboratory activities

Abstract

Metacognitive abilities are a crucial component of the learning process, significantly contributing to the effectiveness of teaching and learning, particularly in preparing future educators. Practicums, as an integral part of science learning, provide opportunities for pre-service biology teachers to practice their metacognitive skills through the process of planning experiments, solving problems, and reflecting on the experimental results. This study aimed to investigate the metacognitive awareness of biology education students in practicum lectures. The study employed a quantitative descriptive design using a survey method, without any treatment applied to the research object. The survey focused on assessing the metacognitive awareness of biology education students during practicum sessions, categorised into two key aspects: knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition. A total of 112 students participated in this study, selected using a purposive sampling technique. The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) was utilised as the primary instrument for data collection. The findings revealed that the knowledge of the cognition aspect achieved an average score of 80.3, classified as high. Meanwhile, the regulation of the cognition aspect scored slightly lower at 79.7, but is still categorised as high.

References

Adiansyah, R., Amin, A. M., Ardianto, A., & Yani, A. (2022). Metacognitive skill profile of biology education students at an institute of teachers’ education in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v8i2.20732

Adnan, & Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing students’ metacognitive skills through guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 954(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012022

Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2020). Identification of preservice biology teachers’ metacognitive awareness and metacognitive skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen. (2022). Pembelajaran dan asesmen. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcomes of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.487

Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 7(1), 39–47. http://www.educatejournal.org/39

Eriyani, E. (2020). Metacognition awareness and its correlation with academic achievement of student teachers: The case of one private higher education institution. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 4(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v4i1.8573

Fauzi, A., & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). The metacognition of pre-service biology teachers: Awareness, skills, understanding, and practices. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2019) (pp. 27–32).

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Griffith, R. (2017). Preservice teachers’ in-the-moment teaching decisions in reading. Literacy, 51(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12097

Heny, A. P., Mercuriani, I. S., & Paidi, P. (2018). An analysis on the achievement of biology cognitive process and product of grade eleven students in Kulon Progo based on the teacher’s teaching experience. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i5p1

Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9066-y

Leasa, M., Rengkuan, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2024). PBLRQA model for the development of metacognitive awareness in pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20977

Masrura, S. I. (2013). Faktor-faktor psikologis yang memengaruhi kesadaran metakognisi dan kaitannya dengan prestasi belajar matematika. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–18.

Öza, H. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation: A cross-sectional study in teacher education context of Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.035

Paidi, Djukri, Yulaikah, S., & Alfindasari, D. (2017). Development of an instrument to assess cognitive process and product in biology senior high school. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(8), 1719–1735.

Pathuddin. (2016). Pengetahuan metakognisi dalam menyelesaikan masalah limit. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 2(1), 50–56.

Sadykova, A., Iskakova, M., Ismailova, G., Ishmukhametova, A., Sovetova, A., & Mukasheva, K. (2024). The impact of a metacognition-based course on school students’ metacognitive skills and biology comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1460496. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1460496

Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2012). Metacognitive aspects of solving function problems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2178–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.450

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Wahyuningtyas, R. S., Soplantila, J. L., & Mamangkey, J. (2022). Gambaran pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) pada calon guru biologi di Universitas Kristen Indonesia. Jurnal Pro-life, 9(1), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.33541/pro-life.v9i1.3757

Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1

Wilson, D. (2018). Considerations for effective laboratory instruction in science classrooms as inspired by metacognition. Learning to Teach Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Through Research and Practice, 7(1), 74–84.

Yasir, M., Fikriyah, A., Qomaria, N., & Al Haq, A. T. (2020). Metacognitive skill of students in science education study program: Evaluation from answering biological questions. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(1), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i1.10081

Yurttaş Kumlu, G. D., & Şahin, F. (2022). Metacognitive activities performed by pre-service science teachers in scientific reasoning skills teaching with the POE technique. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 13(1), 1789–1817. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.22.or066

Downloads

Published

2025-11-13

How to Cite

Heny, A. P., Ina Yuliana, & Putu Krisna Widyantara Sujana. (2025). Metacognitive Skills of Pre-Service Biology Teachers: An Analysis through Laboratory Activities . Pro-Life, 12(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.33541/pro-life.v12i3.7385

Issue

Section

Articles