INTERNATIONAL SECURITY DYNAMICS IN THE RYUKYU ISLANDS: THE UNITED STATES-CHINA BALANCE OF POWER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v10i1.7892Keywords:
Amerika Serikat, Dinamika Keamanan, Kepulauan Ryukyu, Perimbangan kekuasaan, TiongkokAbstract
Kawasan Kepulauan Ryukyu merupakan sebuah wilayah dari Kerajaan Ryukyu yang merupakan mitra diplomatik bangsa Tiongkok dan bangsa Jepang sekaligus beserta dengan negaranya masing-masing. Posisi kawasan ini secara geopolitik berhubungan dengan kontestasi kekuatan antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok. Oleh karena itu, dengan menggunakan analisis teori perimbangan kekuatan dengan berfokus pada peran identitas atau identifikasi, berdasarkan perspektif historisis dari kawasan ini, beserta dengan metode penelitian kualitatif, maka peneliti menemukan bahwa inti dari konflik antara dua negara besar ini, Tiongkok dan Amerika Serikat, terletak pada perbedaan interpretasi resolusi konflik pasca Perang Dunia II—termasuk klausul yang memengaruhi status teritorial Kepulauan Ryukyu. Oleh karena itu, Kepulauan Ryukyu dan penduduk Ryukyu merupakan garis depan pertemuan antara takdir atau konsekuensi sejarah dengan perebutan kekuasaan antara dua kekuatan besar. Ketidakpercayaan dan kecurigaan timbal balik antara Amerika Serikat dan Tiongkok harus menjadi fokus utama, dan saya merekomendasikan untuk kembali menyoroti pentingnya geopolitik Kepulauan Ryukyu sebagai masa depan rekonsiliasi.
References
Allen-Ebrahimian, B. 2023. China is winning online allies in Okinawa’s Independence Movement. Axios, 20 December. Accessed on 13 February 2026. https://www.axios.com/2023/12/20/rob-kajiwara-okinawa-japan-china-independence
Berry (2014). Looking for a Friend: Sino-US Relations and Ulysses S. Grant’s Mediation in the Ryukyu/Liuqiu Dispute of 1879. Thesis. Ohio State University.
Buzan, B. and G. Segal. 1994. Rethinking East Asian security. Survival, 36(2), pp. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339408442734
Central Intelligence Agency of the United States (n.d.). THE RYUKYU ISLANDS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp78-01617a003200010001-4.
Correa, H. 2001. Game Theory as an Instrument for the Analysis of International Relations. Ritsumeikan International Research, 14(2), October 2001. https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/ir/isaru/assets/file/journal/14-2_hector.pdf
Hopf, T. & Allan, B. B. 2016. Making identity count. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190255473.001.0001
Hosoda, T. 2023. Verification of Chinese “Historical” Narratives on Ryukyu/Okinawa. Japanese Views on China’s Narratives. Online. West Bohemian Historical Review. 2023, Vol. 2, pp. 121-145. ISSN 1804-5480. http://hdl.handle.net/11025/55279.
Jemadu, A. 2007. Praktek-Praktek Intelijen dan Pengawasan Demokratis – Pandangan Praktisi: Kelompok Kerja Intelijen DCAF. DCAF – FES SSR Vol. II. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
Kawashima, S. 2024. China rejects the “san francisco system.” The Diplomat, 27 Agustus. https://thediplomat.com/2024/08/china-rejects-the-san-francisco-system/
Keene, D. 2002. Emperor of Japan: Meiji and his World, 1852–1912. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231123402.
Kerr, G. H. 2011. Okinawa: The History of an Island People. Tuttle Publishing. ISBN 978-1462901845.
Lawson, George & Hobson, John M. (2008). What is history in international relations. Millennium - journal of international studies, Vol. 37(2). pp. 415-435. DOI: 10.1177/0305829808097648
Mason, R. 2019. Okinawa Narratives: Delineating Rhetoric, Policy and Agency. Japanese Studies, 39(2), 191–212.
Nakazawa, K. 2023. Analysis: Xi throws Okinawa into East Asia geopolitical cocktail. Nikkei Asia, 14 Juni. https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Picks/China-up-close/Analysis-Xi-throws-Okinawa-into-East-Asia-geopolitical-cocktail
Nishiyama, H. 2019. Geopolitics of disregard: Living a colonial life in Okinawa. Political Geography, 74, 2019, 102042. ISSN 0962-6298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102042.
Office of the Historian, U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). The Chinese Revolution of 1949. Milestones: 1945–1952. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/chinese-rev
Packard, G. R. 2010. The United States–Japan Security Treaty at 50: Still a Grand Bargain? Foreign Affairs, 89(2), 92–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20699853.
Potsdam Declaration. National Diet Library of Japan (n.d.). https://www.ndl.go.jp/constitution/e/etc/c06.html
Sakamaki, S. 1963. The Rekidai Hōan. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 83(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/597769.
Shimoji M. & T. Pellard (eds) (2010). An Introduction to Ryukyuan Languages. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Universitas Studi Luar Negeri Tokyo. ISBN 978-4-86337-072-2.
Snyder, G. H. 1960. Deterrence and power. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4(2), 163-178.
Snyder, H. 2019. Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Stenslie, S. and M. Kjær Galtung. 2023. Xi Jinping’s China: The Personal and the Political. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Stritzel, H. 2014. Securitization Theory and the Copenhagen School. Inside Security in Translation. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307576_2
The Center for Okinawan Studies (n.d.). Geography. https://manoa.hawaii.edu/okinawa/wordpress/?page_id=78
United States Department of Defense (n.d.). 2025. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Accessed on 12 February 2026.
Wang, C.M. 2021. Post/Colonial Geography, Post/Cold War Complication: Okinawa, Taiwan, and Hong Kong as a Liminal Island Chain, Geopolitics, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2021.1884547
Weidenbaum, M. & S. Hughes. 1996. The Bamboo Network: How Expatriate Chinese Entrepreneurs Are Creating a New Economic Superpower in Asia. Free Press, New York. ISBN 978-0684822891.
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/270685
