Teachers’ Needs Analysis for Designing an Inclusive Mathematics Assessment Training Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v11i2.8715Keywords:
educational design research, needs analysis, assessment training program, inclusive mathematics education, elementary school teachersAbstract
Inclusive mathematics classrooms require teachers to collect, interpret, and act on assessment evidence from students with diverse needs, yet assessment training programs are seldom designed from systematic evidence of what teachers already do and still need. Using the analysis and exploration phase of Educational Design Research (EDR), this study identified teachers’ needs as empirical requirements for designing an assessment training program in inclusive mathematics education. Data were collected from 42 elementary school teachers in Bandung, Indonesia, through a needs-analysis questionnaire and from three public inclusive elementary schools through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with principals. Questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively, qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and all sources were triangulated. Teachers reported frequent assessment practice across five domains, and most had never attended training specific to inclusive mathematics assessment. Documents and interviews, however, showed that assessment evidence was seldom recorded, interpreted, and used systematically for individualized instruction. Diagnostic assessment was both the strongest perceived competency need and the most frequently selected training content, followed by assessment adaptation and differentiation. Teachers preferred hands-on workshops and usable modules, and most requested post-training mentoring. These convergent findings were translated into requirements for a training program that is practical (teachers produce assessment artifacts), contextualized (authentic school cases), adaptive (adjustment to student characteristics), and sustainable (a one-day workshop followed by mentoring). The study contributes a triangulated, design-oriented needs-analysis model that links reported practice, documented gaps, and teacher preferences to the subsequent EDR design phase.
References
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Aryanti, N. S. M., Munir, Famelia, & Yunita, S. (2026). Exploring the potential alignment between VR/AR and Universal Design for Learning for mathematics accessibility in elementary schools: A systematic literature review. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 10(4), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v10i4.7632
Azizah, N., Mumpuniarti, Rudiyati, S., & Evans, D. (2024). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical competencies in supporting students with learning difficulties. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26345
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chiani, S. H., Putriawati, W., & Rahmawati. (2025). The influence of student development understanding on mathematics education students’ readiness to manage diverse classrooms. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 10(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v10i2.6955
Chow, W. S. E., de Bruin, K., & Sharma, U. (2024). A scoping review of perceived support needs of teachers for implementing inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(13), 3321–3340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2244956
DeLuca, C., Coombs, A., MacGregor, S., & Rasooli, A. (2019). Toward a differential and situated view of assessment literacy: Studying teachers’ responses to classroom assessment scenarios. Frontiers in Education, 4, 94. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00094
Deviana, T., Sulistyani, N., Roisatul MN, F., & Maulyda, M. A. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen diagnostik matematika untuk mendesain pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di sekolah dasar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(4), 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i4.9773
Dewodo, C. Y., & Agbetorwoka, A. (2025). Teachers’ adaptation of assessment practices for learners with hearing impairments in inclusive schools, Ketu South, Ghana. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 2(3), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijsie.v2i3.2179
Estaji, M. (2024). Perceived need for a teacher education course on assessment literacy development: Insights from EAP instructors. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00272-2
Estaji, M., Banitalebi, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2024). The key competencies and components of teacher assessment literacy in digital environments: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104497
Faradiba, S. S., Sunismi, Ilmi, Y. I. N., & Fuat. (2024). Empowering special needs children: Community outreach for inclusive mathematics education. International Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijcsl.v8i3.80816
Fu, R. (2024). Exploring K–12 teachers’ assessment literacy and self-efficacy in China. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 15(2). https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/79917
Geng, J., & Mohd Yusoff, N. (2022). The shared features of effective improvement programmes for teachers’ assessment literacy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(4), 710–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2084398
Giraldo, F., Escalante-Villa, D., & Isaza-Palacio, D. (2023). English teachers’ perceptions of a language assessment literacy course. HOW, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.2.750
Hull, P., & Vígh, T. (2025). Teachers’ assessment literacy: A descriptive literature review. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2024.00317
Jannah, M., Maryani, I., & Santosa, A. B. (2025). Kesiapan guru sekolah dasar dalam implementasi asesmen diagnostik untuk mendukung pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i1.1467
Kang, M., & Lam, R. (2024). Understanding university English instructors’ assessment literacy: A formative assessment perspective. Language Testing in Asia, 14, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00323-y
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
Li, Z., Yan, Z., Chan, K. K. Y., Zhan, Y., & Guo, W. Y. (2023). The role of a professional development program in improving primary teachers’ formative assessment literacy. Teacher Development, 27(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2223595
Maskos, K., Schulz, A., Oeksuez, S. S., & Rakoczy, K. (2025). Formative assessment in mathematics education: A systematic review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 57, 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01696-x
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Conducting-Educational-Design-Research/McKenney-Reeves/p/book/9780415618038
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nseibo, K., Vergunst, R., McKenzie, J., Kelly, J., Karisa, A., & Watermeyer, B. (2022). Learning together: The dynamics of training teachers for disability inclusion in South Africa. Frontiers in Education, 7, 999814. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.999814
Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1217167. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167
Pastore, S., & Mincu, M. (2024). A feasible balance? The Italian teachers’ standpoint on assessment literacy, assessment practice, and teacher professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2024.2338853
Porta, T., Quane, K., & Gilbert, D. (2026). ‘Nobody is prioritised; they are all prioritised’: Teachers’ application and conceptualisation of Universal Design for Learning in inclusive mathematical learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 29, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09581-4
Ramdani, A. R. (2021, June 3). Anak berkebutuhan khusus bisa mendaftar di semua sekolah Kota Bandung. Merahputih.com. https://www.merahputih.com/post/read/anak-berkebutuhan-khusus-bisa-mendaftar-di-semua-sekolah-kota-bandung
Ratri, T. M., & Herawati, N. I. (2024). Implementasi pelaksanaan pendidikan inklusi di sekolah reguler Kota Bandung. Jurnal Lensa Pendas, 9(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.33222/jlp.v9i1.3524
Roisatul MN, F., Sulistyani, N., Maulyda, M. A., & Deviana, T. (2024). Pendampingan penyusunan instrumen asesmen diagnostik matematika untuk mendesain pembelajaran berdiferensiasi di sekolah dasar. SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 8(1), 771–779. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v8i1.22258
Siburian, D. A. N. B., & Mukhlis, M. (2024). Implementasi asesmen diagnostik dalam Kurikulum Merdeka di SMAN 1 Kabun. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(3), 1921–1929. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i3.1095
Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
Umam, A., & Indah, Y. A. (2020). Exploring in-service TEYL teachers’ assessment literacy: Implication for continuing professional development. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i1.364
Wiese, E., & Nortvedt, G. A. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: A Norwegian case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104357
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 N. Sinta Mustika Aryanti, Zainal Arifin, Budi Setiawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















_(1).png)