The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Multimodal Approaches in Enhancing Learning Engagement and Mathematics Conceptual Understanding Among Junior High School Students: A Systematic Literature Review

Mariani Manik; Phill. I Gusti Putu Sudiarta; I Nengah Suparta

doi:10.33541/edumatsains.v10i3.7597

Authors

Mariani Manik Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha), Bali, Indonesia
Phill. I Gusti Putu Sudiarta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha), Bali, Indonesia
I Nengah Suparta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha), Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v10i3.7597

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, multimodal approach, learning engagement, conceptual understanding, systematic literature review.

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and multimodal learning has created new opportunities to improve mathematics education, especially in enhancing junior high school students’ engagement and conceptual understanding. Although many studies have explored these approaches, their findings remain scattered. This study conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to examine trends, implementation characteristics, and the contributions of AI and multimodal learning from 2015 to 2025. Using Publish or Perish (PoP), Scopus, and ERIC, 261 articles were identified, with 30 meeting the inclusion criteria and analyzed using thematic synthesis in Rayyan. The results show that AI integration has progressed from rule-based intelligent tutoring systems to adaptive and generative models that provide rapid feedback, personalize learning paths, and detect misconceptions. Multimodal learning strengthens mathematical understanding through dynamic visualizations, digital manipulatives, gestures, auditory narration, and interactive simulations, supporting cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement. The combination of AI and multimodal learning yields the strongest effects through hybrid intelligence, merging AI-driven immediate feedback with teacher-led reflection. Overall, both approaches significantly enhance students’ engagement and conceptual understanding, though their effectiveness depends on teacher readiness, technological infrastructure, and pedagogical design. The study underscores the need for improved teacher competencies, better school infrastructure, and curricula supporting adaptive learning, alongside further research on long-term multimodal AI integration in low-resource schools.

References

Almoubayyed, Husni, Rae Bastoni, Susan R. Berman, Sarah Galasso, Megan Jensen, Leila Lester, April Murphy, Mark Swartz, Kyle Weldon, Stephen E. Fancsali, Jess Gropen, & Steve Ritter. (2023). Rewriting math word problems to improve learning outcomes for emerging readers: A randomized field trial in Carnegie Learning’s MATHia. Grantee Submission. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED667961

Arslan, Ç., & Güler Selek, H. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: ChatGPT’s capabilities and limitations in problem posing. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(5), 1189–1205.

http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1486852

Bernacki, M. L., & Walkington, C. (2018). The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000250

Bush, J. B. (2021). Software-based intervention with digital manipulatives to support student conceptual understandings of fractions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2299–2318. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13139

CHANGKUI, C. L. (2025). Applications of large multimodal models (LMMs) in STEM education: From visual explanations to virtual experiments. Artificial Intelligence Education Studies, 1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.6914/aiese.010201

Chinjunthuk, S., Chaiyawut, J., & Junpeng, P. (2025). Developing numbers and algebra outcomes using an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(6), 233–244. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1487118

Copur-Gencturk, Y., Li, J., & Atabas, S. (2024). Improving teaching at scale: Can AI be incorporated into professional development to create interactive, personalized learning for teachers? American Educational Research Journal, 61(4), 767–802.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241248514

Cosentino, G., Anton, J., Sharma, K., Gelsomini, M., Giannakos, M., & Abrahamson, D. (2025). Bridging AI and human feedback: Hybrid intelligence in embodied math education. In LAK 2025.

Daher, W., & Anabousy, A. A. (2025). The didactical knowledge of generative artificial intelligence tools: The case of writing mathematics lessons. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16769

Jailani, N., Rosli, R., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). Blended learning and emerging technologies in mathematics education: A comprehensive structured review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 31(16). www.jatit.org

Lademann, J., Henze, J., & Becker-Genschow, S. (2025). Augmenting learning environments using AI custom chatbots: Effects on learning performance, cognitive load, and affective variables. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010147

Lee, G.-G., Shi, L., Latif, E., Gao, Y., Bewersdorff, A., Nyaaba, M., … Zhai, X. (2023). Multimodality of AI for education: Towards artificial general intelligence. AI4STEM Education Center & University of Georgia. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06037

Li, L., & Zhang, L. (2022). The relationship between physical activity and academic achievement in multimodal environment using computational analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9418004

Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7

Lin, T., & Riccomini, P. (2025). Inclusive education in rural settings: Leveraging technology for improved math learning outcomes among students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(2), 219–226. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1469521

Loibl, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2022). Making connections among multiple graphical representations of fractions: Sense-making competencies. Cognitive Science, 46(2), e13097.

Luan, H., Graf, L., Liu, J., Smyth, B., & Jannach, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Applications and trends. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100023

Magat, R. B., & Sangalang, E. M. (2024). Teachers’ familiarity, perceptions, and training needs on the use of ChatGPT in mathematics instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1471–1487. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4332

Mandal, S., & Naskar, S. K. (2021). Classifying and solving arithmetic math word problems—An intelligent math solver. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3057805

Mohamed, M. Z. Z., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N., Mat Sabri, N., Mahmud, M. K. H., & Baharuddin, S. N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3).

http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1357707

Nye, B. D., Pavlik, P. I., Windsor, A., Olney, A. M., Hajeer, M., & Hu, X. (2018). SKOPE-IT: Overlaying natural language tutoring on an adaptive learning system. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0109-4

Oktavianiasih, N. P., Suweken, G., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2023). Meningkatkan pemahaman konsep trigonometri... Wahana Matematika dan Sains, 17(2), 1–12.

Otero, N., Druga, S., & Lan, A. (2024). A benchmark for math misconceptions... arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03765.

Parwati, N. M. Y. S., Suweken, G., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran TANDUR... MathEdu, 4(2), 145–154.

Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2017). Making connections among multiple graphical representations of fractions. Instructional Science, 45(3), 331–357.

Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Huerta-Pacheco, N. S., Baker, R. S., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Meta-affective behaviour within an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(1), 174–195.

Rzyankina, E., George, F., & Simpson, Z. (2024). Enhancing conceptual understanding in engineering mathematics through e-textbooks. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(4), 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3387102

Song, Y., Kim, J., Liu, Z., Li, C., & Xing, W. (2025). Students’ perceived roles, opportunities, and challenges of a generative AI-powered teachable agent. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2447727

Suweken, G. (2020). STEM-oriented mathematics learning with GeoGebra. ICIRAD.

Suweken, G., Ardana, I. M., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Cahyaningrum, K. A. K. (2025). Development of a problem-based interactive e-module... International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(1), 360–374.

Suweken, G., Waluyo, D., & Okassandiari, N. L. (2017). The improvement of students’ conceptual understanding... International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 4(4), 58–69.

Vest, N. A., Silla, E. M., Bartel, A. N., Aleven, V., & Alibali, M. W. (2022). Self-explanation of worked examples.... In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Vitale, A., Carbonaro, B., Cordasco, G., et al. (2025). Students’ acceptance of the multimodality of the social robot Pepper... In CERME14.

Vitale, J. M., & Walkington, C. (2025). Using anticipatory diagrammatic self-explanation to support learning. Learning and Instruction, 82, 101667.

Walkington, C. (2025). The implications of generative artificial intelligence for mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18356

Yavich, R. (2025). Improving learning outcomes in advanced mathematics... African Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 224–239. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1475983

Zhang, J., Gao, M., Holmes, W., Mavrikis, M., & Ma, N. (2021). Interaction patterns in exploratory learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1211–1228.