Implementation of the ARCS Learning Model (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) in Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Statistics Materials in Class X of SMAS Muhammadiyah Pamekasan

yeniapriliyanti123 yeni

Authors

yeniapriliyanti123 yeni Mahasiswa

Keywords:

ARCS Learning Model, Statistics, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design aimed at enhancing students’ learning outcomes in statistics through the implementation of the ARCS learning model in a tenth-grade class at SMAS Muhammadiyah Pamekasan. The research was carried out in two cycles. The first cycle focused on measures of central tendency, while the second cycle addressed measures of data position. The participants of this study were 24 tenth-grade students. Each cycle consisted of four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The findings indicated that the implementation of the ARCS model had a positive effect on students’ learning outcomes. Students’ learning activities improved from an average score of 2,35 (fair category) in Cycle I to 3,13 (good category) in Cycle II. In addition, students’ responses to the learning process increased from an average of 67,5% (positive category) in Cycle I to 73,32% (positive category) in Cycle II. Furthermore, the level of classical learning completeness rose significantly from 20,83% in Cycle I to 70,83% in Cycle II. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the ARCS learning model is effective in improving students’ learning outcomes in statistics.

References

Ahyuni, S. (2006). Model-model pembelajaran. Widina Media Utama.

Arikunto, S., Suhardjono, & Supardi. (2014). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Bumi Aksara.

Astleitner, H. (2004). The effects of ARCS strategies on self-regulated learning with instructional texts. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 7(2), 1–15. (http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ850349)

Basid, A. (2022). Meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar melalui penerapan pembelajaran kooperatif model ARCS. Cendekia Pendidikan, 1(2), 45–50.

Erawati, D. (2022). Meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik. SHEs: Conference Series, 5(5), 1086–1093. (https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/shes)

Fathoni, M. (2023). Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian. Jurnal Keperawatan, 1(1).

Ginting. (2010). Penerapan model pembelajaran ARCS dan active learning terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa SMK. Pythagoras, 6(1), 11–21. (https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v6i1.617)

Hamalik, O. (2008). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think-pair-share terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan pengembangan karakter siswa. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 7–20. (https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v1i1.221)

Hanafiah. (2020). Pengantar statistika. Bhakti Persada.

Herti, N., & Anisa. (2016). Model ARCS (attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction) dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 546–553.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118.

Kurnia, D. (2010). Model pembelajaran ARCS (attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction). Jurnal Sains Edukatika Indonesia, 3(2), 25–30.

Luritawaty, N. (2024). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada hasil pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 8(1), 45–59. (https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.081.06)

Majid, M. (2020). Penerapan teori belajar behavioristik dalam pembelajaran PAI. Konseling: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapannya, 1(3), 95–103. (https://doi.org/10.31960/konseling.v1i3.343)

Mania, S. (2008). Observasi sebagai alat evaluasi dalam dunia pendidikan dan pengajaran. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 11(2), 220–233. (https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2008v11n2a7)

Marsudi, M. (2016). Penerapan model konstruktivistik dengan media file gambar 3D untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan prestasi belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 23(1), 16–26. (https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v23i1.9351)

Masrukan. (2016). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk menghadapi tantangan MEA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2(1), 605–612.

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. (https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252)

Nurhamzah. (2020). Model konseptual manajemen pendidikan berbasis mutu. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 115–130.

Piaget, J. (2014). Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. Psychological Review, 2(1), 628–632.

Purwanto, N. (2019). Tujuan pendidikan dan hasil belajar: Domain dan taksonomi. Jurnal Teknodik. (https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v0i0.541)

Rachmantika, A. R., & Wardono. (2019). Peran kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran matematika dengan pemecahan masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2(1), 439–443.

Rahman, A., Munandar, S. A., Fitriani, A., Karlina, Y., & Yumriani. (2022). Pengertian pendidikan, ilmu pendidikan, dan unsur-unsur pendidikan. Al Urwatul Wutsqa: Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–8.

Rahmawati, & Syukriani. (2011). Teori belajar penemuan Bruner dalam pembelajaran matematika. Sigma, 3(1), 1–10.

Suhirman, L. (2024). Buku ajar model dan strategi pembelajaran. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Supratman. (2021). Implementasi model pembelajaran ARCS pada materi limit fungsi aljabar. Teaching: Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(3).

Trianto. (2010). Model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif: Konsep, landasan, dan implementasi pada KTSP. Kencana.