The Effects of Reading Assistant Software on the Speech Fluency and Accuracy of EFL University Students

  • Nakhon Kitjaroonchai Asia-Pacific International University
  • Suzanna Maywald Asia-Pacific International University, Thailand
Keywords: EFL students, oral production, Reading Assistant Software, speech fluency, speech accuracy

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of a reading assistant software on the fluency and accuracy of speech production among EFL university students, employing a one-group pretest-posttest design. The participants included 50 Thai undergraduate English majors in their first and second years. Data were analyzed using paired-samples t-tests to measure L2 oral fluency, specifically pruned speech rate (PSR) and mean length of run (MLR). Accuracy rate was assessed by quantifying the proportion of error-free clauses within the participants’ speeches from the pretest and posttest and calculating the average number of error-free clauses per T-unit. Results indicated significant improvements in speech fluency, evidenced by longer uninterrupted speech segments, fewer disfluencies like filled pauses and repairs, and increased overall fluency. Additionally, the post-test showed a higher percentage of error-free clauses compared to the pre-test, reflecting a substantial enhancement in grammatical accuracy. This suggests that the intervention had a positive impact on the participants’ ability to produce grammatically accurate and error-free clauses. These outcomes suggest that the reading assistant software effectively enhances both the fluency and grammatical accuracy of speech production in EFL learners, underscoring its potential benefits in language education contexts.

References

Albadri, A., & Halimah, N. (2022). The correlation between reading and speaking skills on students’ English learning as foreign language. JOEY: Journal of English Ibrahimy, 1(2), 27-42.

Anderson, L. W. (2018). A critique of grading: Policies, practices, and technical matters. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3814

Arunsirot, S. (2017). Implementing a speech analyzer software to enhance English pronunciation competence of Thai students. Journal of Education Studies, Burapha University, 28(2), 116-129.

Arunsirot, N. (2020). Implementing the augmented reality technology to enhance English pronunciation of Thai EFL students. KKU Research Journal (Graduate Studies) Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 142-153.

Bhatt, C., Kothari, P., Masrani, S., & Kokel, V. (2020). Reading Assistant: a reciter in your pocket. In Wearable and Implantable Medical Devices (pp. 163-178). Academic Press.

Bui, G., & Huang, Z. (2016). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, measurement, and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 94-114.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.

Duijm, K., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2018). Professional and non-professional raters’ responsiveness to fluency and accuracy in L2 speech: An experimental approach. Language Testing, 35(4), 501-527.

Elliott, A. R. (1995). Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 530-542.

Ellis Weismer, S., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., Chynoweth, J. G., & Jones, M. (2000). Nonword repetition performance in school-aged children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 865–878.

Errattahi, R., El Hannani, A., & Ouahmane, H. (2018). Automatic speech recognition errors detection and correction: A review. Procedia Computer Science, 128, 32-37.

Faisol, M. A. M., Ramlan, S. A., Saod, A. H. M., Mozi, A. M., & Zakaria, F. F. (2021). Mobile-based speech recognition for early reading assistant. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1962, No. 1, p. 012044). IOP Publishing.

Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 410–419.

Huang, L. (2010). Reading aloud in the foreign language teaching. Asian Social Science Journal, 6(4), 148-150.

Keller, K., Keough, W., & Galgao, F. (2018, October). Student response to use of reading assistant software for English language learners in Thailand. In Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 284-284).

Lennon, F. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387-417.

Li, J. (2020). An empirical study on reading aloud and learning English by the use of the reading assistant SRS. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 103-117.

Mahdi, H. S., & Al Khateeb, A. A. (2019). The effectiveness of computer‐assisted pronunciation training: A meta‐ analysis. Review of Education, 7(3), 733-753.

Manurung, K. (2015). Improving the speaking skill using reading contextual internet-based instructional materials in an EFL class in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 44-51.

Michel, M. (2017) Complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF). In Shawn Loewen & Masatoshi Sato The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.

Moxon, S. (2021). Exploring the effects of automated pronunciation evaluation on L2 students in Thailand. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(3), 41-56.

Natasia, G., & Angelianawati, L. (2022). Students’ perception of using storytelling technique to improve speaking performance at SMPN 143 Jakarta Utara. Journal of English Teaching, 8(2), 282-292.

Nation, I. S. P. (Ed.). (1994). New ways in teaching vocabulary. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Novita, L. (2016). Relationship between reading and pronunciation and students’ speaking skills. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 527-532).

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Boston: McGraw Hill.

Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics,30(4), 590-601.

Paradis, J., Schneider, P., & Sorenson Duncan, T. (2013). Discriminating children with language impairment among English-language learners from diverse first-language backgrounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 971–981.

Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101–143.

Purwanto, A. A., & Syafryadin. (2023). Students’ perception on using Duolingo for learning English vocabulary. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 9(1), 70-82.

Sahatsathatsana, S. (2017). Pronunciation problems of Thai students learning English phonetics: A case study at Kalasin University. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University, 11(4), 67-84.

Scientific Learning (2021). An online guided reading tool for improving vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and prosody. Retrieved from https://www.scilearn.com/products/fast-forword/ reading-assistant

Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.

Segalowitz, N. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 54(2), 79-95

Sidek, H. M., & Rahim, H. A. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 50-56.

Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34-49.

Sorenson Duncan, T. (2010). Emerging L2 consonant systems and performance on non word repetition tasks (Master’s thesis). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Supraba, A., Wahyono, E., & Syukur, A. (2020). The implementation of reading aloud in developing students’ speaking skill. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 145-153.

Thordardottir, E., & Brandeker, M. (2013). The effect of bilingual exposure versus language impairment on nonword repetition and sentence imitation scores. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 1–16.

Thorn, A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non- bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 303–324.

Wiwin, D., Utami, U. W., & Taris, T. (2022). Digital media and its implication in promoting students’ autonomous learning. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 97-106.

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom application. London: Continuum.

Published
2024-06-12