Discourse Analysis of Directive Speech Acts Used by Teachers in Classroom Interactions

  • Qurrotu Aini UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Didin Nuruddin Hidayat UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Nida Husna UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Alek Alek UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Keywords: Directive speech act, discourse analysis, classroom interaction

Abstract

  This study investigates the types of directive speech acts employed by English teachers in online classroom interaction with their students. In addition, the study details the frequency with which teachers in the third grade of SD IT Widya Cendekia use directive speech acts in the context of online learning and classroom interactions. As a descriptive research method, this analysis was designed. The information gleaned from the English class video recording through the Microsoft team application as a learning tool. According to Yule's theory of directive speech act, video recordings were used to capture data for analysis. The study employed Miles and Huberman (1994) qualitative approach to data analysis. According to the findings of this study of teachers' use of directive speech acts in online learning contexts, only 7 of 62 directive utterances were classified as commands, nine as requests, two as suggestions, two as invites, and one as a warning. Besides, the request kind of directive is employed by English teachers in online classroom interactions at a significantly higher frequency than any other form of directive speech acts.

Author Biographies

Qurrotu Aini, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Qurrotu is a postgraduate student at Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Nida Husna, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Nida is a senior lecturer at Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Alek Alek, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Alek is a senior lecturer at Department of English Education, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

References

Alba-Juez, L. (2021). Fast and slow thinking as secret agents behind speakers' (un)conscious, pragmatic decisions and judgments. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.016

Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2021). Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 1–14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401220314857

Azizah, R. N., & Suhardi. (2020). Directive and Commissive Speech Acts in "Kartini" Movie. Education and Humanities Research, 461(Icllae 2019), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.050

Bayat, N. (2013). A Study on the use of Speech Acts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.057

Belligh, T., & Willems, K. (2021). What's in a code? The code-inference distinction in Neo-Gricean Pragmatics, Relevance Theory, and Integral Linguistics. Language Sciences, 83, 101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101310

Biatrik, D., Natsir, M., & Kuncara, S. D. (2020). The functions of directive speech acts of Maleficent character in Maleficent movie. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 4(3), 460–475. https://journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JBSSB/article/view/2869

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). file:///C:/Users/Harrison/Downloads/John W. Creswell & J. David Creswell - Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2018).pdf%0Afile:///C:/Users/Harrison/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Creswell, Cr

Deborah Schiffrin. (2006). Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. In Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press.

Dijk, T. A. Van. (2008). Discourse and Context. Cambridge University Press.

Drid, T. (2018). Language as action: Fundamentals of the speech act theory. Praxis International Journal Of Social Science And …. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Touria-Drid/publication/329814625_Language_as_Action_Fundamentals_of_the_Speech_Act_Theory/links/5cb315ae299bf1209764bdf0/Language-as-Action-Fundamentals-of-the-Speech-Act-Theory.pdf

Fairclough, N. (2003). Textual analysis for Social Research. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Hansen-Thomas, H., & Langman, J. (2017). Discourse Analytic Perspectives on STEM Education. In Educational Linguistics (Vol. 32). SpringerInternational. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-55116-6

House, J, & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Altered speech act indication: A contrastive pragmatic study of English and Chinese Thank and Greet expressions. Lingua. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384121001340

House, Juliane, Kádár, D. Z., Liu, F., & Bi, Z. (2021). Altered speech act indication: A problem for foreign language learners? System, 101(June), 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102554

Huberman, M. B. M. and A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analyis. In Sage Publication. International Educational and Profesional Publisher.

Kemp, S. E. (2017). RAP: A Reading Comprehension Strategy for Students with Learning Disabilities and Concomitant Speech-Language Impairments or ADHD. Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v4i2.11614

Kim, A., & Kwon, I. (2020). Hortatives, imperatives, and the directive speech-act continuum: A usage-based approach to the Korean -ca hortative construction. Lingua, 245, 102928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102928

Kroeger, P. R. (2018). An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Language Science Press. http://langsci-press.org/catalog/144

Leeuwen, T. Van. (2008). Discourse and Practice. Oxford University Press.

Licea-Haquet, G. L., Velásquez-Upegui, E. P., & ... (2019). Speech act recognition in Spanish speakers. Journal of …, 141(1), 44–56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216618302406

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitaive data analysis. In SAGE Publication (Second). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Muhammad Naf’an Sholihin. (2015). An Analysis of Illocutionary Acts Performed by Nemo In Finding Nemo A Movie by Andrew Stanton. In Teaching and Teacher Education (Vol. 12, Issue 1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1044943%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.581%0Ahttps://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2547ebf4-bd21-46e8-88e9-f53c1b3b927f/language-en%0Ahttp://europa.eu/.%0Ahttp://www.leg.st

Patrick Griffiths. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics (Heinz Giegerich (ed.)). Edinburgh University Press.

Rahmah, R. I., Yohanes, B., & Suhartono. (2020). Sexist Language In The Speech Of Moslem Female Preachers (Critical Discourse Analysis) Bahasa Seksis pada Perempuan Penceramah Agama Islam (Analisis Wacana Kritis). Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 48(1), 1–17.

Samantha, R., & Almalik, D. (2019). Requestin Speec Act In “seri pendalaman materi” Bahasa Inggris for XII Grade English Text book. CALL, 3(2), 58–66. http://www.tjyybjb.ac.cn/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9987

Sari, K. P. (2018). Teacher's Directive Speech Acts at Kindergarten School. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 7(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv7i12735

Schwartz, J., & Hom, C. (2021). Embedding speech-act propositions. Synthese, 198(11), 10959–10977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02763-4

Searle. (1969). An essay in the philosophy of language. Historical Pragmatics, 16.

Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act. In Perspectives in the philosophy of language: a …. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=_KL1y5bRGfAC%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PA253%5C&dq=speech+act%5C&ots=kfCqUDdeOE%5C&sig=vQS3AaIevzr7rBKdiz-06mtgXJE

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018

Vivian Cook. (2008). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching (fourth Edi). Hodder Education.

Wahyu Santosa, A., & Kurniadi, A. (2020). SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS OF TEACHER TALK IN EFL CLASSROOM Corresponding Author. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 21(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v20i2.9871

White, A. R., Austin, J. L., & Urmson, J. O. (1963). How to Do Things with Words. In Analysis (Vol. 23, p. 58). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3326622

Willemsen, A., N. Gosen, M., van Braak, M., Koole, T., & de Glopper, K. (2018). Teachers’ open invitations in whole-class discussions. Linguistics and Education, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.001

Yule, G.. (1996). Pragmatics. In Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315884318-16

Published
2023-06-20