Exploring the Organization and Framing of the Literature Review  of English Language Education Study Program Theses

Erina Andriani

doi:10.33541/jet.v8i2.3670

Erina Andriani Universitas Sanata Dharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i2.3670

Keywords: organization, framing, literature review, thesis

Abstract

Literature reviews provide the literature that illustrates the common knowledge and the researchers’ stand in their research. The literature review is designed with suitable organization and framing so the readers can build their knowledge. However, only few studies on the organization and framing of a literature review. Therefore, the researcher wanted to conduct a study on English Language Education Study Program (ELESP) theses. There are two research questions in this research: “How are the literature reviews of the ELESP students’ theses organized?” and “How are the literature reviews of the ELESP students’ theses framed?” The goal of this research is to explore the organization and framing of the literature review of the ELESP students’ theses. This research used content analysis. The data were gathered from thirty theses in education and linguistic fields from batch 2016 to 2018. The instruments to gather the data were two structured observation sheets for the organization and framing. The result shows that for the organization, thirty theses used thematic organization, none of them used chronological organization, and combinations of organization existed. Regarding the framing, some elements, author, year, topic, and result, were always mentioned in every observed thesis.

References

Agus, A. (2018). The implementation of storytelling to improve listening skill of the 8th grade students of SMPN 1 yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Ali, E. A. M., & Mahadin, R. S. (2016). The use of discourse markers in written discourse by students of English at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 23-35. Retrieved from: https://www. ijhssnet.com

Alvita, R. (2018). Students’ perception on the implementation of talking stick model to practice speaking skills. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Amanda, C. S. (2017). An analysis of the use of women’s language features by Hillary Clinton in presidential debates. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Amarta, R. R. (2017). English blends in The Highend Teen e-magazine 2016 editions. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Anggita, C. (2017). Morphological and syntactic errors in cooking English book draft. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Ariety, G. R. (2016). The effectiveness of deductive approach and inductive approach in teaching grammar to the sixth graders of Aisyiyah full day elementary school: Comparative study. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Bram, B., Anandari, C. L., Kristiyani, C., Ena, O. T., Suharjanto, L., Yulia, M. F., & Veniranda, Y. (2016). Sarjana pendidikan thesis and research paper handbook (4th ed.). retrieved from https://www.usd.ac.id/fakultas/pendidikan/pbi

Carnwell, R., Dally, W. (2001). Strategies for the construction of a critical review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 1, 57-63. doi: 0.1054/nepr.2001.0008

Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication 57, 99-118. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x

Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 103-126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059

Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in edu. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6(2), 167-190

Gusnita, N. (2018). Students’ perceptions on the use of pictorial storytelling to improve students’ speaking skills. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Hari, K. (2016). Negative feedback as perceived by English Language Education Study Program batch 2012 students. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Hastrianda, H. R. I. (2018). Students’ perceptions on the use of videos in learning narrative texts. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Hastuti, S. T. B. (2017). A study of English tutors’ code switching in training the PGSD USD English. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Hutami, R. N. (2017). Types and speech functions of code switching used by Keara in Antologi Rasa novel. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Ingram, L., Hussey, J., Tigani, M., & Hemmelgam, M. (2006). Writing a literature review and using a synthesizing matrix. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/ tutorial_center/writespeak

Kinanti, S. (2016). Designing a vocabulary size test for the fourth semester students of ELESP Sanata Dharma University. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Kumara, R. D. C. (2016). The use of anagrams to improve the students’ vocabulary learning strategy in XI IPA 1 class, SMA Pangudi Luhur Sedayu. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Lambert, M. (2012). A beginner’s guide to doing your education research project. London: Sage.

Listyantari, N. A. (2016). A syntactic analysis of the functions of to-infinitive phrases in the Jakarta Post. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Manosih, P. A. (2016). The analysis of swear words usage uttered by female characters as seen in 4.3.2.1 movie. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Margana, R. M. (2016). The English sound changes among Javanese students of the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Meyanti, I. N. (2016). Designing a set of English learning materials using the role play for the tenth grade Accounting students of SMK Negeri 1 Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Mudavanhu, Y. (2017). Quality of literature review and discussion of findings in selected papers on integration of ICT in teaching, role of mentors, and teaching science through science technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 189-201. doi: 10.5897/ERR2016.3088

Mukti, T. W. P. (2016). The use of code switching in the English Language Education Study Program lecturers’ instructional languages. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Palupi, T. S. (2018). Students’ perception on the cooperative learning approach to enhance speaking skill in play performance class. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Prabaningtyas, F. B. (2016). Study of code-switching in the sequel of 99 Cahaya di Langit Eropa movies. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Amin, A. S. (2014). Writing a literature review research paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basics and Applied Sciences, 3(1), 47-56. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate. net/publication/311735510_Writing_a_Literature_Review_Research_Paper_A_step-by-step_approach

Reger, R. K. & Kincaid, P. A. (2021). Content and Text Analysis Methods for Organizational Research. Oxford Research Encyclopedias of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.336

Ritan, Y. C. G. (2018). Ambiguity and tree structure of sentences in home movie. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Sally. (2013). A synthesis matrix as a tool for analyzing and synthesizing prior research. Retrieved from http://www.academiccoachingandwriting.org/dissertation-doctor/dissertation-doctor-blogiii-a-synthesis-matrix-as-a-tool-for-analyzing-and-synthesizing-prior-research

Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Setiawan, M. A. T. (2018). An analysis of the English grammar deviations in the 2016 song lyrics by African-American singers. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Susanto, F. R. B. (2018). The study of impoliteness in the Prison Break series. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Tarigan, G. A. (2018). The categories of speech functions used by the main characters in Moana movie. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Taum, M. G. S. (2017). Basic writing students’ responses towards the implementation of free writing activity. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Taylor, D., & Procter, M. (2008). The literature review: A few tips on conducting it. Retrieved from https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/types-of- writing/literature-review

Tukan, A. I. A. L. (2017). The English Language Education Study Program students’ motivation to speak English outside of class. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Virginio, G. A. (2018). A study of types and speech functions of code switching in the Masdha FM instagram’s account. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Wallwork, A. (2011). English for writing research papers. New York: Springer.

Wijaya, A. A. (2017). The role of digital learning facilitation: Socrative app to engage students in learning English. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Wijaya, A. R. T. (2017). English teachers’ classroom management strategies in SMP Maria Immaculata Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Zebua, K. A. D. P. (2017). The use of verbal reinforcement to motivate 11th grade students of SMA Budya Wacana Yogyakarta to speak English. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University

Zhao, H. (2014). The textual function of discourse markers under the framework of relevance theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(10), 2105-2113. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.10.2105-2113