Pre-Service EFL Teachers and Faculty Members' Views on the Challenges and Complexities of Online Research Supervision amid COVID-19
Undergraduate research supervision has long been one of the most intricate learning issues due to its complexities and challenges. The policy to learn from home during COVID 19 pandemic could have increased the complexities and challenges. This study aimed at discovering the nature of problems and challenges of undergraduate research supervision in the English Education Department of Universitas Kristen Indonesia Jakarta, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative method using a content analysis approach, this study was conducted in October to November 2020 involving 5 faculty members and 15 students who participated in the research supervision held amid COVID 19. Data from the faculty members were gathered through a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, and data from the students were gathered using a questionnaire and focus group discussions. The obtained data were analyzed using the qualitative content analysis technique. The results revealed that the students viewed the online undergraduate supervision during COVID as very complex and challenging due to their limited research and writing skills, inability to access the research fields, inadequate ICT skills for research, absence of face-to-face communication, and ICT constraints. Both supervisees and supervisors generally viewed the online research supervision was more complex and challenging than the traditional face-to-face research supervision.
Anderson, C., Day, K. & MacLaughlin, P. (2006) ‘Mastering the Dissertation: Lecturers’ Representations of the Purposes and Processes at Masters Level Dissertation Supervision’. Studies in Higher Education. 31(2), 149–168
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210–230.
Changiz, T, Adibi, P, Hosseini, M, & Tootoonchi, M. (2003). Viewpoints of supervisors about the problems in the process of dissertations for general medicine program Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 3(1): 23-33.
Donnelly, R., Fitzmaurice, M. (2013) Development of a Model for Blended Postgraduate Research Supervision in Irish Higher Education. In C. O’Farrell & A. Farrell(eds.) Emerging Issues in Higher Education III, From Capacity Building to Sustainability,Dublin, Educational Developers in Ireland Network (EDIN).
Dowling, R., & Wilson, M. (2017). Digital doctorates? An exploratory study of PhD candidates’ use of online tools. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1058720
Gumbo, M. T. 2018. University of South Africa supervisors’ knowledge of technological tools and ICTs for postgraduate supervision. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 17(4): 54‒68
Heinze, A., & Heinze, B. (2009). Blended e-learning skeleton of conversation: Improving formative assessment in undergraduate dissertation supervision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 294-305.
Hunter A.B., Laursen S.L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a Scientist: the Role of Undergraduate Research in Students’ Cognitive, Personal, and Professional Development. Science Education, 91, 36-74.
Ishiyama, J. (2002). Does early participation in undergraduate research benefit social science and humanities students? College Student Journal, 36(3), 380-386.
Kaul, S, Ferguson, C., Yanik, P., & Yan, Y. (2016). Importance of Undergraduate Research: Efficacy and Student Perceptions. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA. June, 2016.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
Lopatto, D. (2007), “Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning,” CBE – Life Sciences Education, 6, pp. 297-306.
Lopatto D. & Tobias, S. (2010). Science in solution: The impact of undergraduate research on student learning. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research
Maltese, A., Harsch, J. & Jung, E. (2017). Evaluating Undergraduate Research
Experiences—Development of a Self-Report Tool. Education Sciences, 7(4), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040087
Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Murphy, J. M. (2001) Reflective teaching in ELT. In: Celce-Murcia M. (Ed.). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle; 2001. pp. 499-514
Ndayimirije, M. & Bigawa R.N. (2020). Rethinking the Role of Research in Pre-service Training of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language: Case of the University Teacher-Training College in Burundi. In Savvidou, C. (Ed.). Second Language Acquisition: Pedagogies, Practices and Perspectives. IntechOpen. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93120
Pardede, P. (2012). Attitudes of Pre-Service EFL Teachers toward Research. In Proceeding of The 6th International Seminar 2012 “Research in Teacher Education: What, How, and Why?”. Salatiga: Widya Sari Press, pp. 617-630
Park, C. 2005. War of Attrition: Patterns of Non-completion amongst Postgraduate Research Students. Higher Education Review, 38(1), 48-53.
Prinsloo, P. & Maritz, J.E. (2015). When silence is not golden: an evaluation of policy frameworks for PhD supervision in an ODL context. Postgraduate supervision conference, Stellenbosch.
Radnor, H. (2002). Researching your professional practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Roets, L. (2013). Learning through reflection: Supervising DRC master’s degree students within the open distance and learning context. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 3(10): 139‒149.
Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316, 548 –549. DOI: 10.1126/science.1140384
Seymour E., Hunter A.B., Laursen S.L., & DeAntoni T (2004). Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in the Sciences: First Findings from a Three-Year Study. Science Education, 88, 493–534
Sim, K.N. & Stein, S. J. (2019). Enhancing the roles of information and communication technologies in doctoral research processes. Research report. Commissioned by Ako Aotearoa National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence, Wellington, New Zealand.
Stein, S.J. & Sim, K.N. (2020). Enhancing the roles of information and communication technologies in doctoral research processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00212-3
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738–1747. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
Taraban, R., & Blanton, R. L. (Eds.). (2008). Creating effective undergraduate research programs in science: The transformation from student to scientist. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Thiry H, Laursen S.L., & Hunter A.B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. Journal of Higher Education, 82, 357–388.
Thomas, J.R. and Nelson, J.K. (2001). Research Methods in Physical Activity (4th Ed.). Albany: Human Kinetics.
Ulla, M. B. (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 797-810. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ulla.pdf
Wenderholm, E. (2004). Challenges and the Elements of Success in Undergraduate Research. inroads, The SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(4)
Copyright (c) 2021 JET (Journal of English Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in JET are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.