Peer Feedback to Improve Indonesian Adult Learners’ Writing Skills: A Review
Abstract
Demonstrating good writing skills in English is considered important to master for students in tertiary level. In addition, as higher education institutions in Indonesia have been conducting teaching and learning activities online to mitigate Covid-19 viral spread, students’ engagement in learning has been reported to be low due to boredom and tiresome in an online learning environment. Therefore, teachers need to plan and implement strategies to promote students’ skills in writing and students’ engagement in learning activities, in this case writing course. One of them is by practicing peer feedback. The purpose of this paper is to critically review peer feedback in improving Indonesian adult learners’ writing skills in English course. In this literature review, 23 documents (a book chapter and peer-reviewed articles) were synthesized to find how peer feedback is relevant and beneficial in the tertiary education context. This paper argues that peer feedback is advantageous in improving adult learners’ writing skills in that it facilitates meaning negotiation, it fosters critical thinking, and it promotes collaborative learning. However, teachers should anticipate possible issues emerging in peer feedback practice by providing pre-requisite training for students.
References
Allen, D., & Mills, A. (2014). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498-513. doi: 10.1177/1362168814561902
Ananiadou, K., & M. Claro. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries (OECD Education Working Papers No. 41). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.
Cahyono, B. Y., & Amrina, R. (2016). Peer feedback, self-correction, and writing proficiency in Indonesian EFL students. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 178-193.
Chen, T. (2016). Technology supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing class: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
Cozma, M. (2015). The challenge of teaching English to adult learners in today’s world. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 197(WCES-2015),1209-1214.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2015). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami014
Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccioo4
Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., Van de Ven, M., & Saab, N. (2016). Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Education Technology, 00(00), 1-10. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12520
Kurihara, N. (2017). Do peer reviews help improve student writing abilities in an EFL High School classroom? TESOL Journal, 8(2), 450-470. doi: 10.1002/tesj.282
Lai, Y. (2010). Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 432-454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30-43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systemic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 14 (4), 595-621. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2
McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495-1506. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.868878
Nikou, F. R., Bonyadi, A., & Amirikar, N. (2015). Investigating the relationship of critical thinking skills and the quality of Iranian intermediate TEFL students’ writing. Advances in Languages and Literary Studies, 6(2), 57-64. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.2p.5s
Paltridge, B. (2018). Writing for publication. In L. Woodrow (Ed), Introducing course design in English for specific purposes (pp. 508-519). Routledge.
Park, J. (2017). ClassPrep: A peer review system for class preparation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 511-523. doi:10.1111/bjet.12390
Pardede, P. (2021). A Review of Current Conceptual Research On Short Stories Use in EFL Classrooms. Journal of English Teaching, 7(1), 31-42.
Rahiem, M. D. H. (2021). Indonesian university students’ likes and dislikes about emergency remote learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 17(1), 1-18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.11525
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611-633. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43651696
Sukandi, S. S., & Syafar, D. N. (2018). EFL students’ responses to learning basic reading and writing skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(1), 40-53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/ 10.24815/siele.v5i1.8419
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169. doi: 10.1080/713611428
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20-27. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Usman, M., & Irnanda, S. (2016). Model of teaching writing skill through email at Serambi Mekah University and Muhammadiyah University, Indonesia. Reseachers World: Journal of Arts, Science, & Commerce, 7 (4), 72-79. doi: 10.18843/rwjasc/v7i4/08
Wahyudin, A. D. (2018). The impact of online peer feedback on EFL students’ writing at tertiary level. BAHTERA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.11525
Yang, Y. (2011). A Reciprocal peer review system to support college students' writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 687-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Understanding the role of learners with low English language proficiency in peer feedback of second language writing. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2),483-494, doi: 10.1002/tesq.305
Yusuff, K. B. (2015). Does self-reflection and peer-assessment improve Saudi pharmacy students’ academic performance and metacognitive skills? Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 23(3), 266-275. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.018
Zhao, H., Sullivan, K. P. H., & Mellenius, I. (2014). Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 807-819. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12094
Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. A. (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 362-368. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/45176051
- View 789 times Download 789 times pdf
Copyright (c) 2022 JET (Journal of English Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in JET are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
