Indonesian Novice EFL Teachers' Perceptions of the Use of Peer Assessment in Speaking Class
Abstract
There is convincing evidence of the potential advantages of peer assessment; however, earlier studies on peer assessment in the learning process have largely focused on students’ views on it. Although much can be inferred from the students’ views about peer assessment in the learning process, there is a limited empirical study on the practical use of peer assessment by teachers and their responses. This study attempts to offer salient information for educational institutions, especially on the importance of peer assessment as a part of their instructional design for novice EFL teachers. This qualitative study aims to investigate Indonesian novice EFL teachers’ perceptions of the use of peer assessment in a speaking class as well as its’ benefits and challenges. The data was obtained from six Indonesian novice EFL teachers through a semi-structured interview. Findings revealed the two groups of teachers’ different perceptions, benefits, and challenges of peer assessment which were affected by their understanding of peer assessment and undergraduate study experiences. Hence, educational institutions for pre-service EFL teachers should take peer assessment into account to be integrated into their instructional designs to enable them to experience and perceive peer assessment as a valuable alternative way of language assessment.
References
Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. & Dawson, P. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13.
Al-Barakat, A. & Al-Hassan, O. (2009). Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers’ preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 399–413.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Ashenafi, M. M. (2015). Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–26.
Bay, E. (2011). The opinions of prospective teachers about peer assessment. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 909–925.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Buana, G. P. (2016). Students’ opinion to the implementation of peer assessment. ELTIN Journal, 4(2), 13–20.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Person Education, Inc.
Douglas, D. (2010). Understanding Language Testing. London: Routledge.
Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical Language Testing. London: Hodder Education.
Gaynor, J. W. (2019). Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–18.
Gielen, S., Dochy, F. & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 137–155.
Hall, K. (2000). A conceptual evaluation of primary assessment policy and the education policy process in the Republic of Ireland. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 30(1), 85–101.
Hanrahan, S. J. & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53–70.
Harris, L. R. & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101–111.
Hogg, L. M. (2018). Empowering students through peer assessment: Interrogating complexities and challenges. Reflective Practice, 1–14.
Hsia, L., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. (2015). A web-based peer-assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self-efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1–15.
Li, L., Liu, X. & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536.
Liu, N. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.
Lladó, A. P., Soley, L. F., Sansbelló, R. M. F., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N., … Moreno, L. M. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment : An interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592–610.
Malan, M. & Stegmann, N. (2018). Accounting students’ experiences of peer assessment: A tool to develop lifelong learning. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 1–20.
Miller, L. & Ng, R. (1994). Peer assessment of oral language proficiency. Perspectives: Working Papers of the Department of English, City Polytechnic of Hong Kong, 6, 41–56.
Panadero, E. & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: Positive experience predicts use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 133–156.
Patton, C. (2012). ‘Some kind of weird , evil experiment': Student perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 719–731.
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E. & Schellens, T. (2018). Peer assessment use, its social nature challenges and perceived educational value: A teachers’ survey study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 124–132.
Seifert, T. & Feliks, O. (2018). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–17.
Siow, L. (2015). Students’ perceptions on self- and peer- assessment in enhancing learning experience. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(2), 21–35.
Sluijsmans, D. (2002). Student Involvement in Assessment: The Training of Peer Assessment Skills. Netherlands: Open University.
Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M. B. & Mihret, D. G. (2018). Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: An explorative study. Accounting Education, 27(3), 259–285.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27.
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I. & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149–169.
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. & van Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.
Wanner, T. & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16.
Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. & Chang, C. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83–92.
White, E. (2009). Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course. Asian EFL Journal, 33, 1–55.
Yang, C. C. R. (2019). Student responses to online peer assessment in tertiary English language classrooms. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 23(1), 1–24.
Zhao, H. (2018). Exploring tertiary English as a foreign language writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13.
Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y. & Zhang, F. (2017). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–12.
- View 408 times Download 408 times pdf
Copyright (c) 2021 JET (Journal of English Teaching)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in JET are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
