Multilingualism in An ESP Online Learning Class A Case in An English For Professional Course

  • Melania Wiannastiti Binus University
Keywords: multilingualism, ESP, online learning, students’ attitude, multibahasa, pembelajaran daring, sikap mahasiswa

Abstract

ESP (English for Specific Purposes) in online learning classes has its way of communicating since the students do not meet physically because  they only meet virtually. The study aims to find out the languages used among the online learning students in an ESP online classroom, especially in interacting and communicating with one another in a team and virtual classroom, and to figure out the students’ attitude toward multilingualism in ESP online classroom communication. A questionnaire is distributed to 24 students joining an English for Professional class at BINUS Online Learning as the participants. The data from the questionnaire is analyzed qualitatively in the form of percentages. The result shows that the students apply multilingualism in the online learning class for interaction and communication. They show both positive and negative attitudes toward the use of many languages in their team and classroom communication while English is required as the means of communication and interaction in the team and classroom.

References

Bakia, M, et all. (2012). Understanding the Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productivity. USA: Center for Technology in Learning

Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D. 2010.The Diversity of Multilingualism in Education. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, nr 205, pp 37- 53. DOI: 10.1515/IJSL.2010.038

Cohn, A.C. & Ravindranath, M. (2014). Local Languages in Indonesia: Language Maintenance or Language Shift? Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia Agustus 2014, 131-148 Volume ke-32, No. 2, ISSN: 0215-4846

Inacol - Wicks, M. Et al. (2012). The Online Learning Definitions Project. VA: Inacol

Lowry, P. (2009). Interactive Assignments for Online Students. SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS VOLUME 7 - NUMBER 2 - YEAR 2009

Meissner, T. (2017). Video Conferencing for Mindfulness Program: Benefit, Experiences and Recommendation. International Journal of Whole Person Care Vol 4, No 2, 2017

Neet, N.C.K. (2014). Multilingualism in Higher Education versus Facilitators’ Professional Language Competencies in South Africa. Int J Edu Sci, 7(2): 385-389 (2014)

Okal, B.O. (2014). Benefits of Multilingualism in Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(3): 223-229, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2014.020304

Ouadoud, M. (2018) Learning Management System and the Underlying Learning Theories: Towards a new Modeling of an LMS. International Journal of Information Science & Technology –iJIST, ISSN: 2550-5114 Vol.2 No. 1, 2018

Riza, H. (2008). Resources Report on Languages of Indonesia. Proceeding: The 6th Workshop on Asian Language Resources 2008.

Rhode, J., et al. (2017). Understanding Faculty Use of the Learning Management System. Online Learning, 21(3) 68-86. doi:10.24059/olj.v%vi%i.1217

Sert, N. & Boynuegri, E. (2017). Digital technology use by the students and english teachers and self-directed language learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 9(1), 24-34.

Stein-Smith, K. (2017). The Multilingual Advantage: Foreign Language as a Social Skill in a Globalized World. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 7, No. 3; March 2017

Watson, J. F., & Kalmon, S. (2005). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved on 28 June 2018 http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/tech/Keeping_Pace2.pdf

Published
2022-12-31
Section
Articles