PERBANDINGAN ANTARA SRPMK DAN SISTEM GANDA PADA GEDUNG RUMAH SAKIT GIGI MULUT UNIVERSITAS UDAYANA

angganawibawa I Gusti; I Putu Ellsa  Sarassantika; Ida Ayu Cri Vinantya Laksmi; I Wayan Gde Erick Triswandana; I Putu Deny Surastika Aditama

doi:10.33541/cen.v5i2.6100

angganawibawa I Gusti Program Studi Teknik Sipili Fakultas Teknik Dan Perencanaan Universitas Warmadewa
I Putu Ellsa Sarassantika Universitas Warmadewa
Ida Ayu Cri Vinantya Laksmi Universitas Warmadewa
I Wayan Gde Erick Triswandana Universitas Warmadewa
I Putu Deny Surastika Aditama Universitas Warmadewa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/cen.v5i2.6100

Keywords: Hospital; Deviation; Special moment resisting frame system; Dual System.

Abstract

Bali is one of the provinces that are destinations for foreign and domestic tourists. This causes Bali to follow developments in several sectors, one of which is the construction sector. Of course, every building in Bali must guarantee its safety and comfort. Especially in infrastructure buildings, the security of which must be guaranteed because it involves the safety of many people inside. For example, hospital buildings included in risk category IV need to pay attention to their deviations. For example, in the Udayana University oral dental hospital building which was previously planned using SRPMK, the design deviation value met the requirements or did not exceed the permit deviation. This oral dental hospital building will be re-planned using a dual system. So these two structural systems are chosen for comparison regarding the deviation values between the two to provide information regarding which structural system is more optimal. In this writing, the analysis shows that the deviation value produced by the dual system is smaller than the special moment resisting frame system. Namely, with a maximum value of the double system of 8.96 mm and SRPMK with a maximum value of 21.696 mm with a clearance of 30.77 mm on the 2nd floor in the x direction and in the Y direction the maximum value of the double system is 12.60mm and SRPMK with the The maximum value is 20.07 mm with a permit of 26.92 mm on the 3rd floor.

References

ATKINS. (t.t.). Manual for Analysis & Design Using ETABS.

Computer and Structures.Inc (CSI). (2013). ETABS. Computer and Structures, Inc (CSI).

Filipus, C., Simanjuntak, P., & Tampubolon, S. P. (2024, August). Comparison of special moment resisting frame system and dual system on earthquake resistant reinforced concrete building structure based on SNI 1726: 2019. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3039, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Fernandus, B., & Sarassantika, I. P. E. (2022). Reducing the torsional behavior in irregular special moment resisting frames with steel dampers. 1(2), 68–74.

Hirel, P., Servie, K., Dapas, O., & Pandaleke, R. (2018). PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG BETON BERTULANG DENGAN SISTEM RANGKA PEMIKUL MOMEN KHUSUS. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(Juni), 361–372.

Kazaz, İ., Avşar, Ö., & Dilsiz, A. (2024). Importance of building inspection on the seismic response of a severely damaged RC structure during the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence. Engineering Failure Analysis, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108410

Khosravi Larijani, A., & Tehrani, P. (2024). Investigating the effect of earthquake incident angle on seismic response and fragility analysis of irregular RC buildings with nonparallel systems. Structures, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107135

Pradesh, A. (2016). ANALYSIS OF A STEEL FRAMED BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT. 4(12), 86–95.

Sarassantika, I. P. E., & Hsu, H. L. (2022). Improving brace member seismic performance with amplified-deformation lever-armed dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 192, 107221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107221

Sarassantika, I. P. E., & Hsu, H. L. (2023). Upgrading framed structure seismic performance using steel Lever-Armed dampers in the Braces. Engineering Structures, 280(January), 115683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115683

Sarassantika, I. P. E., Putra, I. B. G. P., Tampubolon, S., & Sanjaya, I. G. D. P. (2023). ANALISA PERFORMA SEISMIC MERU (STRUKTUR BERTINGKAT PAGODA KHAS BALI): PRELIMINARY STUDY. Jurnal Rekayasa TeknikSipil dan Lingkungan, 4(1), 25–35.

Sarassantika, I. P. E., Sulistiana, P. D., Sanjaya, I. G. D. P., Hartawan, I. M. N., Tejadinata, I. G. N. A. E. A., & Suwandi, K. Y. P. (2023). Seismic Performance Analysis of Meru (Bali Pagoda): Preliminary Study. E3S Web of Conferences, 445. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344501014

Silaban, G. T. N., Tampubolon, S. P., Sri Mulyani, A., & Felestin. (2023). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung Bertingkat dengan Analisis Respon Spektrum dan Analisis Riwayat Waktu. Science Tech: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30738/st.vol9.no1.a14295

Simanjuntak, P., Tampubolon, S. P., & Amsal, H. P. (2022). EVALUASI RESPON SEISMIK STRUKTUR BANGUNAN UNIVERSITAS TERBUKA PALU TERHADAP GEMPA SULTENG 28 SEPTEMBER 2018. Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 3.

SNI 1726-2019. (t.t.). SNI-1726-2019-Persyaratan-Beton-Struktural-Untuk-Bangunan-Gedung.

Srinath, G., & Gopikrishna, K. (2024). Influence of Repeated Earthquake events on Structural Response of Multi‐storeyed RC buildings. Structures, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106911

Sulaksitaningrum, R., Umniati, B. S., Ellsa Sarassantika, I. P., Casita, C. B., Pratama, M. M. A., Santoso, E., & Sulton, M. (2019). The optimal damper placement configuration for three-dimensional RC building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 669(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012056

Tampubolon, S. P., Sarassantika, I. P. E., & Suarjana, I. W. G. (2022). Analisis Kerusakan Struktur Bangunan dan Manajemen Bencana Akibat Gempa Bumi, Tsunami, dan Likuifaksi di Palu. Bentang : Jurnal Teoritis dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil, 10(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.33558/bentang.v10i2.3263